Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewer Guidelines

Peusijuek Journal of Islamic Culture and Ethics

Introduction

Welcome to the Peusijuek Journal of Islamic Culture and Ethics reviewer community. Peer review is a crucial component of scholarly publishing, ensuring the quality, validity, and integrity of published research. As a reviewer, you play a vital role in maintaining the academic standards of our journal.

Our Commitment to Reviewers

We value your time and expertise. Our review process is designed to be efficient, respectful, and transparent. We provide clear guidelines and support throughout the review process.

Reviewer Responsibilities

As a reviewer, your primary responsibilities include:

1

Quality Assessment

Evaluate the manuscript's originality, methodology, significance, and adherence to academic standards.

2

Constructive Feedback

Provide specific, constructive comments to help authors improve their work, regardless of the publication decision.

3

Timely Review

Complete reviews within the agreed timeframe or notify the editor if an extension is needed.

4

Confidentiality

Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript content and review process at all times.

Review Process

Our peer review process follows these steps:

 
1

Invitation

You receive a review invitation with manuscript details and abstract. Please respond within 3 days.

Action: Accept or decline the invitation based on expertise and availability.
2

Manuscript Evaluation

Download and evaluate the manuscript using our review form and criteria.

Time: Typically 2-3 weeks for initial review.
3

Submit Review

Submit your evaluation through our online system, including comments for authors and editors.

Format: Use the provided review form with structured feedback.
4

Editor Decision

The editor makes a final decision based on all reviews. You may be asked to review revisions.

Notification: You'll be notified of the final decision.

Evaluation Criteria

Please evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:

Criteria Key Questions Rating Scale
Originality Does the manuscript present novel concepts? Is it sufficiently different from existing literature? High/Medium/Low
Methodology Are the methods appropriate and well-described? Is the analysis sound and replicable? High/Medium/Low
Significance Does the research contribute meaningfully to the field? Is it relevant to Islamic culture and ethics? High/Medium/Low
Clarity Is the writing clear and well-organized? Are arguments logically presented? High/Medium/Low
References Are citations appropriate and current? Is the literature review comprehensive? High/Medium/Low

Writing Effective Comments

  • Be specific and provide examples
  • Separate major concerns from minor suggestions
  • Maintain a constructive and respectful tone
  • Focus on the work, not the author
  • Provide suggestions for improvement when possible

Confidentiality and Anonymity

????

Double-Blind Peer Review

Our journal uses a double-blind review process. Both reviewers and authors remain anonymous.

Confidentiality Requirements:

Manuscript Content
Do not discuss or share manuscript content with anyone outside the review process.
Reviewer Identity
Do not reveal your identity to authors through comments or other means.
Review Details
Do not use information from the review for your own research without permission.

Ethical Guidelines for Reviewers

⚖️

Conflict of Interest

Declare any conflicts of interest immediately. This includes: competitive or collaborative relationships with authors, financial interests, personal relationships, or any other circumstances that might affect impartiality.

Key Ethical Principles:

✓
Objectivity - Evaluate manuscripts based on academic merit alone
✓
Respect - Provide constructive criticism without personal comments
✓
Transparency - Report suspected plagiarism, data fabrication, or ethical violations
✓
Timeliness - Complete reviews promptly or decline if unavailable

Review Timeline

Standard Review Timeline

We aim to complete the initial review process within 4-6 weeks from invitation acceptance.

3
Days to Respond
to review invitation
2-3
Weeks for Review
to evaluate manuscript
1
Week Extension
available upon request
4-6
Weeks Total
initial review process

Requesting an Extension:

If you need more time to complete your review, please contact the editor as soon as possible. We can typically grant a 1-week extension upon request.

Reviewer Recognition

We appreciate the valuable contribution of our reviewers. In recognition of your service:

Certificate of Appreciation

Annual certificate acknowledging your contribution as a reviewer

Reviewer Profile

Option to be listed in our annual reviewer acknowledgment page

Discount on APC

25% discount on Article Processing Charge for your next submission

Publons Integration

We integrate with Publons to help you track, verify, and showcase your peer review contributions. Your reviews can be added to your Publons profile for professional recognition.

Contact for Reviewers

For questions regarding the review process, technical issues, or ethical concerns:

Editor-in-Chief:
Dr. [Editor Name]
Email: editor.seulanga@gmail.com
Managing Editor:
[Managing Editor Name]
Email: [managing.editor@email.com]

Subject Format: "Reviewer Query - [Manuscript ID or Topic]"

Last Updated: December 2024
These guidelines are reviewed annually to ensure alignment with best practices in peer review.